← Online advertising guides

Advertising on Instagram vs Perch

Instagram advertising is a creative commitment before it is a media one. How that compares with a static slot on a site, and which suits a small budget.

5 min read

The useful comparison here is not about reach or price. It is about what each one asks you to produce. Instagram is a visual medium with a high and rising standard, and advertising there is judged against everything else in the feed. A direct ad space asks for a line of text or a single image sized to a box. The gap between those two production burdens is, for most small businesses, the deciding factor — and it is the one least often costed.

A broad audience where only a small share is reachable in person, beside a local site audience where most of it is A BROAD AUDIENCE MOST OF IT CANNOT WALK IN. A NEARBY AUDIENCE MOST OF IT ALREADY DOES.
A feed reaches broadly. A slot on a well-chosen site reaches narrowly, and for a business with a catchment the narrow audience often contains more actual customers.

What does the creative really cost to make?

An advert on Instagram competes for attention against content people chose to follow. That sets a standard: decent photography or video, an idea that survives being seen for a second and a half, and enough variations that the same thing is not shown to the same person until they resent it. Creative fatigue is real, and the answer to it is more creative.

If you can shoot well, or your product photographs itself, this is an advantage — the medium rewards you. If producing one good image is a fortnight's procrastination, the media cost was never the real cost.

A static slot inverts the demand. A heading, an optional subheading, a link, and it is done. It will never be exciting. It is also finished, and it keeps working while you get on with the business.

Instagram AdsA direct ad space
FormatVisual-first; weak imagery fails outrightText or a simple image, fitted automatically
Creative productionThe real cost, and it recursOnce, and it lasts
Reader's state of mindBrowsing, not decidingReading about the subject already
Best atDiscovery — reaching people who do not know youBeing present where a decision gets made
Creative fatigueReal; performance decaysMinimal at small scale

The creative burden is the row most often left out of the comparison, and for a business without a designer it is frequently the largest cost of the whole exercise.

Where is the reader's head when they see it?

Someone scrolling a feed is being entertained. Advertising there interrupts, and has to earn the interruption. Someone reading an article about kitchen extensions is, at that moment, thinking about kitchen extensions. A relevant advert next to relevant writing is not an interruption at all; it is arguably the most useful thing on the page.

Neither state is better in general. Interruption at scale sells things people did not know they wanted. Context sells things people are actively considering. Match it to what you are selling.

Is this discovery, or a decision?

Instagram is strongest at the top of the funnel: showing your existence to people who had no idea. Direct placements on relevant sites tend to be strongest lower down, where somebody is comparing options and a name in the right place lands. A local trade with a full diary usually needs the second; a new product with nobody aware of it usually needs the first.

What does each cost to run for a month?

An Instagram campaign costs its budget, plus its creative production, plus the time of whoever manages it. All three are real; only the first is usually written down. A direct space costs the daily rate times the days. On Perch that is a number the site owner published in advance, and an ad can be stopped whenever you like — you are billed for the days it ran and nothing after.

What about the publisher side?

If you also run a website, it is worth saying plainly that Instagram's ad system is not a way to earn from it. It sells space in their app. Selling a slot on your own site is a separate business you can start in about a minute: pick a size, set a daily rate, paste one line of code, and approve the advertisers you want. The unsold slot carries its own invitation, so the reader who runs a shop can buy it without you making a single sales call.

Attention rented from a platform disappears when spending stops, while an ad space on a site you own remains and can be sold again RENTED REACH SPENDING STOPS, THE REACH STOPS WITH IT. AN OWNED SURFACE YOUR AD SPACE STILL THERE TOMORROW, AND SELLABLE AGAIN.
The asymmetry worth noticing: money spent in a feed is gone when the campaign ends. A slot on a page you own is inventory you still have.

How should you split a small budget?

If you have a limited amount and no help: spend the first part where the creative you can genuinely produce will hold up. If that is photography, use the feed. If it is a sentence, buy space on two or three sites your customers actually read, run for a month, and use a distinct landing page or a mentioned offer to see whether anything came of it. Then put the second part into whichever one moved.

Related reading: the Facebook comparison for the targeting side, paid ads for how pricing models differ, and submitting an ad for the mechanics.

Keep reading

← All online advertising guides